RUS ENG FR
 
 
 
 
 
COURT OF EURASIAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY
 
 
How to find us
Office:222 43 03
Fax:222 60 98
5 Kirova str.,
Minsk, 220006,
Republic of Belarus
External Relations
November 19, 2013

On November 25, 2013 the Grand Chamber of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community will decide on

 

the admissibility of the request for interpretation of the Agreement on public (municipal) procurement of December 9, 2010, submitted by the Ministry of Economy and Budget Planning of the Republic of Kazakhstan as well as on the designation of a Judge-Rapporteur;

 

the constitution of a Chamber of the Court to deal with the application by the company "Angang Steel Co., Ltd" (China) contesting the decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission of May 24, 2012 No. 49 “On measures for protection of economic interests of manufacturers of polymer-coated rolled steel in the Customs Union” as well as on the assignment of the application and designation of a Judge-Rapporteur;

 

the constitution of the Appeal Chamber of the Court to deal with an appeal by the limited liability company “Jackpot” (Russia) against the judgment of the Chamber of the Court of October 31, 2013 in the case brought by the said company against the Eurasian Economic Commission, the company contesting certain provisions of point 4 of the of the Procedure for customs duty relief in importing of certain goods into the common customs territory of the Customs Union, approved by the decision of the Commission of the Customs Union of July 15, 2011 No. 728, as well as on the assignment of the appeal and designation of a Judge-Rapporteur;

 

the constitution of the Appeal Chamber of the Court to deal with an appeal by the limited liability company “SeverAvtoProkat” (Russia) against the judgment of the Chamber of the Court of November 1, 2013 in the case brought by the said company contesting point 4 of the of the Procedure for customs duty relief in importing of certain goods into the common customs territory of the Customs Union, approved by the decision of the Commission of the Customs Union of July 15, 2011 No. 728, as well as on the assignment of the appeal and designation of a Judge-Rapporteur.

November 01, 2013

On November 1, 2013 the Chamber of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community delivered a judgment in the case brought by the limited liability company «SeverAvtoProkat» (Russia) contesting point 4 of the Procedure for customs duty relief in importing of certain goods into the common customs territory of the Customs Union, approved by the decision of the Commission of the Customs Union of July 15, 2011 No. 728.

The Chamber of the Court dismissed the action of the limited liability company «SeverAvtoProkat».

Point 4 of the Procedure for customs duty relief in importing of certain goods into the common customs territory of the Customs Union, approved by the decision of the Commission of the Customs Union of July 15, 2011 No. 728, was recognised to comply with treaties, concluded within the Customs Union ant the Common Economic Space.

Press

November 01, 2013

On October 31, 2013 the Chamber of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community composed of the presiding judge-rapporteur Zholymbet N. Baishev, judges Anna M. Sokolovskaya, Konstantin L. Chayka held hearings on the admissibility of the applications of the Graphite India Limited and the HEG Limited (India) challenging the decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission of December 25, 2012 No. 288 “On the anti-dumping measure imposing an anti-dumping duty on imports of graphite electrodes originating in India to the common customs territory of the Customs Union”.

The Chamber adopted the orders on the admissibility of these applications and on the joinder of cases.

The hearing is to be held on January 14, 2014 at 10.00 in the Court seated at 5 Kirova str., Minsk, Republic of Belarus.

Press

November 01, 2013

On October 31, 2013 the Chamber of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community delivered a judgment in the case brought by the limited liability company «Jackpot» (Russia) contesting particular provisions of point 4 of the Procedure for customs duty relief in importing of certain goods into the common customs territory of the Customs Union, approved by the decision of the Commission of the Customs Union of July 15, 2011 No. 728, as not complying with subpoint 5) of point 2 of the Article 96, with the articles 219, 210, with part six of subpoint 2) of point 2 of the Article 211 of the Customs Code of the Customs Union.

The Chamber of the Court dismissed the action of the limited liability company «Jackpot».

The provisions of part three of point 4 of the Procedure for customs duty relief in importing of certain goods into the common customs territory of the Customs Union, approved by the decision of the Commission of the Customs Union of July 15, 2011 No. 728, as regards the company's commitment to pay customs duties in accordance with the customs legislation of the Customs Union if making transactions involving the transfer of ownership for the imports which had been released from customs duty, were recognised to comply with subpoint 5) of point 2 of the Article 96, with the articles 219, 210, with part six of subpoint 2) of point 2 of the Article 211 of the Customs Code of the Customs Union.

Press

 
Photo Gallery
Video